The table shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same 2 periods.

Essay topics:

The table shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same 2 periods.

The given table summarizes information about how many people paying a visit to Ashdown Museum, while the charts illustrate the satisfaction rate of said visitors before and after the museum's renovation. Overall, there was an increase in the numbers of visitors as well as their satisfaction towards the museum after being modernized.

Ashdown Museum before being refurbished had welcomed 74,000 visitors. The figure then went up significantly by 18,000 people the year after new features were added to the museum.

There were changes in the visitor satisfaction survey results as well. Before being renovated, a majority of people, 40% to be accurate, said that they were not pleased with their museum visit, whereas 10% of people admitted to completely dislike the trip. Among 45% that said they enjoyed the museum, only 15% said to be very satisfied. However, after refurbishment, this rate shot up dramatically to 35%, plus 10% more in the satisfied ratio, making the total percentage of satisfied visitors increase to 75%. On the other hand, only 20% said they disliked the modernized features with 5% confessed to totally hate them. The remaining 5% stayed unresponsive.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (3 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'museums'' or 'museum's'?
Suggestion: museums'; museum's
...e of said visitors before and after the museums renovation. Overall, there was an incre...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, well, whereas, while, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28723404255 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77214937047 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627659574468 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.4999047618 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308761363766 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114133162174 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696025213491 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20425279503 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560346980744 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.