The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarise the information

The tables below illustrate the data regarding sale of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana throughout some European countries in 1999 and 2004.

According to the first table, it is transparently manifest that all of the countries faced a growth in coffee sales from 1999 to 2004, while UK had a dramatic rise in the light of the fact that from 1.5 million euros in 1999 went up to 20 million euros in 2004. Although Switzerland doubled its sales during these five from 3 million euros to 6 million euros, other nations like Denmark, Belgium and Sweden revealed slight increase from 1.8-2, 1-1.7 and 0.8-1 million euros between 1999 and 2004 respectively.

When it comes to second table, similarly, countries encountered an increase except Sweden and Denmark by 1.8 and 2 million euros in 1999 climbed to 1 and 0.9 million euros in 2004 respectively. Though UK and Belgium depicted significant increases across these years from 1-5.5 and 0.6-4 million euros, the amount sales are not important to focus on. On the other hand, Switzerland possesses an enormous amount sale and in 1999 it account for 15 million euros, while this country experienced a triple rise and stand in 47 million euros in 2004.

In conclusion, it is noticeable that during these years countries unified their efforts to increase their sales with respect to Fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...able, it is transparently manifest that all of the countries faced a growth in coffee sale...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'accounts'?
Suggestion: accounts
... an enormous amount sale and in 1999 it account for 15 million euros, while this countr...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o Fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, similarly, so, while, in conclusion, with respect to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1017699115 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83829812597 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53982300885 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.6824731923 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.714285714 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2857142857 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.4285714286 5.23603664747 276% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20830177006 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129762496396 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118915887233 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187175484021 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129119215634 0.0819641961636 158% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.