The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table charts illustrate the sale data for Fairtrade tea and pineapples of 5 countries in two years 2010 and 2015.
Overall, as can be seen, the total income of Fairtrade tea tended to increase all the countries surveyed from 2010 to 2015. Another visible trend is that the Fairtrade pineapples sales rose in 3 out of the 5 areas, especially Austria during the same period.
In terms of sales of tea, the sale number of Fairtrade-labelled tea in Austria was 4 million euros in 2010. The figure in Germany, France, Norway and Netherlands were lower, at 2.8, 2.5, 2 and 1.8 million euros respectively. In the year 2015, the sale figure for France was a significant growth and peak at the highest revenue, at 21 million euros, while Austria, Germany, Netherlands and Norway witnessed a slight jump in tea sales, at 8, 3, 2.7 and 2 million euros respectively.
As regards to Fairtrade pineapples sales, the total revenue of Austria increased dramatically to 32 million euros (from 16 to 48 million) in 2010, whereas in France and Netherlands only grew from 2-6.5 million and 1.6-5 million euros respectively. By contrast, the period from 2010 to 2015 saw a slow decline in pineapples sales in Norway and Germany, with from 2.8-2 and 3-1.9 million euros respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erms of sales of tea, the sale number of Fairtrade-labelled tea in Austria was 4 ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86528447274 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.6344093165 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.625 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167375983453 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102772547848 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737007152522 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136133155602 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553732239033 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.