The take below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The take below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates the data of the underground railway systems throughout 6 metropolises around the world.
Because of had been established in 1863, London not only had the oldest system of underground railways but also had the longest route as opposed to the remaining cities, which are 394 kilometers and nearly 40 times higher than Kyoto whose route’s length was the shortest (11 km). By contrast, Los Angeles’s rail line systems were the newest and were set up recently in 2001 but these route length and the number of passengers per year stood at a low level compared to other cities.
Different from Kyoto, which just attracted 45 million passengers anually, Japan’s capital-Tokyo fascinated the highest amount of travelers with was 1927 million passengers per year, and especially, 1927 was also the year that its systems of the railway opened. Paris ranked second in both length’s route and the number of passengers. These figures in Washington DC had no significance which had 126 kilometers of rail route and 144 million passengers per year.
In conclusion, the railway systems of different cities vary a lot in terms of the open day, the length’s route, and the number of passengers during one year.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10447761194 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76632126716 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606965174129 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.0702605031 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.571428571 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0784713312742 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437913078238 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401825754431 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0684525712803 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345659084124 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.