The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981,1991 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The given three pie charts depit the amount of money which a school in the UK spent annually for the years 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Overall, the majority of the expense was spent on teachers’ salaries, contrasted to the minimum of insurance.
It is apparent from the data that by far the greatest amount was used for teachers’ salaries, accounted 40% of the total spending in 1981, and this figure rose to precisely a half in 1991, followed by a slight fall of 5% in 2001. Other workers’ salaries saw a gradually decline from 1981 to 2001. It was initially 28% in 1981, then decreased to 22% in 1991 and eventually dropped to 15% in 2001.
It is interesting to note that in 1981, the amount spent on furniture and equipment and resources such as books were exactly the same, being 15% of the total amount. Whereas in 1991, there was more money spent on resources than furniture and equipment, namely 20% and 5% respectively, the reverse took place in 2001, with 23% of the spending was used for buying furniture and equipment and only 9% of the amount was spent on resources like books. Starting from 1981 to 2001, the amount of money used for insurance rose steadily from a mere 2% in 1981, after that increased to 3% in 1991 and 8% in 2001.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
... 2001. Other workers' salaries saw a gradually decline from 1981 to 2001. It was initially 28%...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57522123894 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6054245598 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.8919570206 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.25 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153081646368 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831709333972 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744954644801 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114015065315 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938611717719 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.