The two diagrams are the maps of a library The first is of the library in 1990 and the seconds is of how it looks at present in 2017

Essay topics:

The two diagrams are the maps of a library. The first is of the library in 1990 and the seconds is of how it looks at present in 2017.

The pair of maps illustrate information about a library that how it changed over the period 1990 to 2017.

Overall, the prominent change that can be seen in the library is that there are more digital facilities in 2017 than in 1990.

In 1990, the help desk was bigger and located in the southern west side of the library, whereas at the present year, it is smaller in size and is moved to the southern east corner. This was done to make large space for a special study room in that place in 2017. The study desk, computer with online materials, audio/video room and reference books are all present in both the year. However slight adjustments were made to the location of each of them. It is clear that they are all moved from their location and shifted a little towards the southern side of the library in order to make space for a connection room for laptops and for computers with internet room in the northernmost corners of the library in 12017.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: smaller
...ary, whereas at the present year, it is smaller in size and is moved to the southern east corne...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 786.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54335260116 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33497394229 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566473988439 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3649561461 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.285714286 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227431010516 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103458107625 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938068036921 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194112063367 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757672600348 0.0819641961636 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.