The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.

The two maps illustrate before and after the development of an island for tourists.

Overall, it is clear that accommodations and other facilities were built with a pier connecting the island.

Firstly, the island was empty before developing except some trees on the west and east. In terms of housing, 9 accommodations were built at the center, with footpath joining around the houses. Although 6 more residential buildings were constructed similarly beside the middle one, restaurant and reception can be seen separating the accommodation by intercepting in between them. Taking into consideration, the restaurant is in the north and reception just in between the two accommodations. Also, the pier was placed on the sea, in front of the reception which linked the vehicle track together from the restaurant to it.

secondly, two boats were added to the sea where it can be ridden from the pier. With the beach remaining the same position on the end of the west side, people can now walk along the footpath from the 6 housing area. Moreover, a swimming pool was created beside the beach.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...together from the restaurant to it. secondly, two boats were added to the sea where ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07182320442 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91025475441 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613259668508 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6959651833 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16253412265 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704888132091 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112229475964 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134683600346 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144067037481 0.0819641961636 176% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.