The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourists facilities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two maps below illustrate conditions of the island, before and after construction of touristic premises.

According to the first map, there is a beach in the western part of the island and the length of the island measured approximately 200 meters.

When it comes to second map, it is transparent that there are enormous buildings constructed. There are some accommodation places at west and center of the island. Also, a restaurant is built that located in the north part of the island and a reception block is between two accommodation places circled by vehicles track that goes down to pier. In the pier people can take advantage of sailing. In addition, footpath has connected accommodations to each other and continues toward beach. At beach, people can not only have walk, but could also swim in the sea.

In conclusion, a various number of facilities regarding attraction of more tourists are provided. Not only would people benefit buildings in the island, but they could also enjoy sea activities.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'walked'.
Suggestion: walked
...ach. At beach, people can not only have walk, but could also swim in the sea. In ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, regarding, second, so, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08333333333 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87020822208 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6533308402 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172818991473 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070419109923 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101446327545 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141453115905 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126620133733 0.0819641961636 154% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.