The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The two maps illustrate the changes of road for entering to a hospital for two particular years.
According to the first map, there was a place for bus stop both sides of the hospital road. On the east side of the hospital road, there was a car park area for the staffs of the hospital and other people. The city hospital was surrounded by a ring road with a passage to access the main building from the parking area. There was no other entry point except the southern part of the hospital.
On the other hand, there were a number of noticeable changes in the hospital's access road in 2010 as compare to the previous one. The parking area had been separated into two parts. The place for parking public vehicles had been shifted into the east part of the city hospital while the staff parking place was in its previous location. Another major change was the bus station which had been relocated into the west side of the hospital road and it was connected to two roundabout. The crossing of hospital road and city road had been replaced with a roundabout. The other roundabout was between hospital road and ring road. In 2010, There were two separate entry points to the hospital, one from the staff park and other from public parking area.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56696428571 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24183165108 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.433035714286 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2866451808 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.25 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200404615121 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100252180766 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543168213711 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162105371621 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00464990243027 0.0819641961636 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.57 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.