Writing task 1 the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
A glance at these provided pie charts reveals the amount of fuel source used in both Australia and France from 1980 to 2000.
On balance, during the period shown both the total electricity production in both Australia and France saw a noticeable rise. Comparable as their total units were, the figure for each fuel source was a remarkable exception.
The largest segment in the pie chart of Australia in 1980 belonged to coal with 50 units followed by that in natural gas, hydropower, and nuclear power. Besides, the units of electricity by coal rose rapidly by 80 units and consistently ranked first in 2000. Meanwhile, the figure for nuclear power in France increased up to nine times.
In France, electricity production by coal and gas shared a comparable figure, with accurately 25 units, and accounted the biggest one in 1980. Ultimately, while number of coal usage saw a modest growth to 25 units as same as that for oil, units of natural gas and hydropower fell to the minimum threshold, at only 2 units.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arable figure, with accurately 25 units, and accounted the biggest one in 1980. U...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86781609195 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65870914374 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568965517241 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5317457739 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.875 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24738469233 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109108216018 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619695363101 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159016642577 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593396566978 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.