The best way for Governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and 7 days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, providing free public transit all the time is considered as one of the most effective ways to reduce traffic congestion problem. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this idea.
On the one hand, operating public transportation network day by day is not necessary. The overcrowded road is merely happened at a specific time, depending on the time of working. At night or breaking dawn, the number of commuters moving on the road is lessened, and as a result, lots of available vehicles are not able to be used. For example, in some municipal cites of Vietnam, roads usually are clogged in the morning and evening, at the time when people go to work and come back home. However, not many Vietnamese people obligatorily go outside at night. Thus most public busses contain no passenger after 10 pm.
On the other hand, supporting public transport without any charge is genuinely not a useful measure for economic development. Residents may be required to pay more taxes for transportation services, which they even hardly use due to its convenience and time-consuming. Therefore, I believe that instead of investing in a state transport network, it is possible if the Government spent budget for other essential fields such as education, health care, or infrastructure construction.
To conclude, in my perspective, providing public vehicles with no cost day after day is inevitably unnecessary and is not a satisfactory solution to tackle the congestion issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are usually
... some municipal cites of Vietnam, roads usually are clogged in the morning and evening, at ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...eople obligatorily go outside at night. Thus most public busses contain no passenger...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14876033058 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06109945861 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644628099174 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9370343741 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.833333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227005321799 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751049709058 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777956412214 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140127506565 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462006652174 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.