The inequality between rich and poor nations is now wider than it has ever been before. what do you think are the main causes of this difference and what do you think can be done to reduce the gap?
An imbalance between developed and underdeveloped nations has been observed for many decades. But due to certain factors, this gap is widening with the passage of time. Integration of international bodies and industrialised nations can offer a helping hand to poor nations to bridge this gap.
Poor nations are often plagued by corruption and civil unrest. This limits their investment towards building an educated, productive and healthy society. It can be seen by lower rates of educational institutions, multinational companies and medical facilities in such countries. Secondly, the disrespectful attitude of citizens towards society, rules and regulations and remuneration of taxes impedes the growth of poor nations. This factor takes birth due to income inequality which does not allow them to fulfill their basic needs.
Due to this gap, citizens of poor countries often migrate to first world countries for better education, employement and standard of living. Thus, this trend directly affects the gross domestic product of these nations; as the movement of young generation empowers rich nations but endangers the economy of poor nations. Moreover, rising trade barriers restrict the access to trade which further puts poor nations in a situation of financial loss.
Industrialised nations should provide a economic aid to poor nations to eradicate poverty and improve their lifestyle. With the help of financial assistance, these countries can alleviate education and medical facilities. Moreover, free trade should be promoted to reduce barriers of import and export. This will pave the way to develop their local markets in a successful manner.
In conclusion, the rising gap is a matter of concern for the global trade and peace. Hence, combined efforts of society and nations are suggested to eliminate this concern .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iving. Thus, this trend directly affects the gross domestic product of these nati...
^^
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... Industrialised nations should provide a economic aid to poor nations to eradic...
^
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alised nations should provide a economic aid to poor nations to eradicate poverty...
^^
Line 7, column 359, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a successful manner" with adverb for "successful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... the way to develop their local markets in a successful manner. In conclusion, the rising gap is a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n, the rising gap is a matter of concern for the global trade and peace. Hence, c...
^^
Line 9, column 173, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... are suggested to eliminate this concern .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54255319149 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89414609327 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602836879433 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0376925841 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9411764706 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180054589445 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567343592946 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302176091198 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102106093988 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359628392693 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.