Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
Committing a crime can have variety of reasons, and sometimes there are many unfair judgments for persons that are caught because of their inappropriate behaviors.
Life has various vicissitudes, and maybe we confront with situations that willingly or unwillingly because of the available conditions do what we should not do never. Furthermore, in majority of times people associate crimes with ways of breeding. They think that if a person has fostered properly, committing a crime would decrease dramatically. Psychologists never have refused the effects of right nurturing on doing less crimes, but unfortunately, sometimes because of our problems we can not be able to control ourselves. Therefore, if crimes are happened by criminals the past life of offenders should be considered, and in my opinion if these person has mental health, has high job level, is a kind parent, does not have any crime in the past, etc. should pay fine for his/her crime at the first time. Furthermore, he/she should sign a contract in court to control him/herself in the next time of committing a crime.
On the other hand, there are many offenders that repeat their crimes frequently and never keep their promises after their first crime. It has been proved that these categories have serious problems in their past life too. For example they are children of divorce. These children that have problems in their breeding, probably will repeat their crimes. Therefore, law should confront with them seriously and get them in to prison. Also, they should be kept far from ordinary people under supervision of the governments in their release time from prison. Because they can be very harmful for society.
All in all, it is important that every society members to support the children that may pose crimes in the future because of their life conditions. Because there is more to good nurture than financial supports.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun crimes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...the effects of right nurturing on doing less crimes, but unfortunately, sometimes be...
^^^^
Line 3, column 645, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this person' or 'these people', 'these persons'?
Suggestion: this person; these people; these persons
...uld be considered, and in my opinion if these person has mental health, has high job level, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uture because of their life conditions. Because there is more to good nurture than fina...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18649517685 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71870228376 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546623794212 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2318159149 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8823529412 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21179066634 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741696466111 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050141685804 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120848494574 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0628199965301 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.