Mobile hones have become indispensable gadgets in today’s world. Despite they can bring countless positive elements into individuals’ life, they have some drawbacks. I would argue that benefits of smartphones are overshaded by their downsides. This essay will discuss both sides.
On the one hand, smartphones have countless benefits. To begin with, it enables employees work unplugged. They can send or read e-mails via their phones while shopping at mall, waiting meals at restaurant or even driving. Further and more importantly, it provides visual communication. Counterparts can arrange a meeting online even though they live in completely different continents or family members are able to meet via applications such as Zoom or Skype. Therefore, having a mobile phone will be beneficial for people.
On the other hand, mobile phones can lead to many detrimental problems. One of the primary disadvantages is that the cost of smartphone is vigorously more expensive than landline cost. When people purchase a smartphone, internet and music applications are generally needed that will rise cost dramatically. It is also distractive. Mobile phone users can receive a lot of notifications from applications like Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, consequently it can be difficult to concentrate on work. Further and more importantly, many people prefer spending time online rather than spending time with family which damage fabric of society. Communication of family members in the same house can be minimum because of mobile phone addiction. Hence, if people own a gadget, they will probably face with many difficulties.
By way of conclusion, visual communication and online working are two primary benefits of mobile phone ownership. However, it has many economical and social drawbacks, consequently I would contend that advantages of it are eclipsed by downsides.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58741258741 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10588719739 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611888111888 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4356278547 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.9 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168735007373 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454737172477 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531987974626 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098221304656 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041159782317 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.55 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.