All parents want the best opportunities for their children. There are some people who think that schools should teach children skills, but others think having a range of subjects is better for the children`s future. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Parents always wish for their children to have the best opportune moments in the world. It is often argued by many that whether children should be given skills training courses at schools or teaching numerous subjects is more beneficial for the future of children. In my opinion, skills training can more likely help children in enhancing future capabilities.
On the one hand, many argue that indoctrinating new skills is important for the development of a student’s career. For instance, in some countries, soft skills as communication, public speaking are being taught to promote more confidence for pupils which can be considered very crucial for the betterment of a child’s career. Plus, people always have a strong belief that soft skills would help them achieve zenith in life as well as advance their future ability high in use in some ways. This is because mastering skills will create the confidence required by the kids to present themselves in front of others. As in today professional era, employers always strongly desire such a good communicable candidate to be their potential employee. Therefore, I believe that school should have a more flexible environment for students practising skills.
On the other hand, some often believe that learning more skills could help children sharpening themselves. It is evident that many skills will lead people to their goals. For example, a salesman who demands to master their interpersonal skills to increase sales and create a close relationship with clients as well. Further, having enough training while in school helps pupil be more aware of the new environment and opens more door to become the best version of themselves. Hence, the student should be given more practical skills at school to get them more acquainted with the situation they may face in the future.
All in all, learning many skills at school is surely important as it will lead to a bright future of the children as well as assist them to choose the better life to live in. However, learning a variety of subjects also need to be maintained by the school due to the background knowledge that it is offered.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ldren in enhancing future capabilities. On the one hand, many argue that indoctr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 848, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ronment for students practising skills. On the other hand, some often believe th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05352112676 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71607731425 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521126760563 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0556486079 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.125 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1875 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344236035419 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1214655697 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845414387702 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232625398352 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100367311772 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.