With all the problems in the world today, spending money on space exploration is a complete waste. The money could be better spent on other causes.
To what extent do you agree with this view?
It is often argued that governments could better spend money on solving the problems in the world today instead of spending it on space exploration. Although I agree that that development of a country is the best way to use the money but I think space explorations are also important as they give human further knowledge.
On the one hand, the governments should definitely spend on solving the problems of their nations. There are several global issues that need immediate resolution. For example, millions of people still do not have access to potable water. Developing countries such as India, Pakistan etcetera have serious problems in health, education and employment sectors. It is very important to fulfill the basic needs before launching big space missions.
On the other hand, space research helps us to learn more about the universe we are a part of. For instance, the exploration of the moon improved our understanding of space and environment that can support human life. There is a possibility that space missions may find life on other planets. We may also be able to find planets similar to earth that can sustain human life. Since the population growth is depleting earth's natural resources day by day, finding another planet that is inhabitable would will leave huge benefits on people's lives in future.
To conclude, though I agree that the governments should spend more to eradicate problems in their countries, I think space exploration should also be financed as it is in the larger interest of the whole humanity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s in the world today instead of spending it on space exploration. Although I agre...
^^
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...tion growth is depleting earths natural resources day by day, finding another planet that...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 544, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ll leave huge benefits on peoples lives in future. To conclude, though I agree that th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate problems in their countries, I think space exploration should also be finance...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, for example, for instance, i think, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06274509804 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70941514194 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596078431373 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8019921533 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3076923077 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216594122794 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696615673657 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766733636553 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137529583274 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898552008887 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.