The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that the problem of traffic jam should by tackled by giving people free bus and train passes at all time whenever they need. While I accept that may suit many people, I believe that government should give more solutions to tackle this problem.
On the one hand, there are a variety reasons why helping people easily access to public transports without paying the fee is beneficial in some ways. First, the using of bus and trains would help to ease traffic flow. If the government issue free bus and train passes for people in their countries, this would encourage more people to use public transport instead of driving their car to go offices or schools. Furthermore, using free public transports can help people avoid rush hour traffic jams. For example, if every people chose to drive their car to go home, the traffic would more worst that waste them a lot of time on the roads.
On the other hand, governments should consider giving more solutions to solve the traffic congestion. Firstly, people who do not abide by the rules of the roads should be severely punished. For example, in Viet Nam, when people try to cross red lights, they must be paid about 200,000 VND for their guiltiness. Secondly, one way to reduce traffic problems in the cities is to upgrade and expand transportation provision. This may lead to ease traffic flow in city centres and the surrounding area.
In conclusion, it is certainly true that giving people free public transportations can be an important factor to solve traffic jam, but this is by no means the key consideration for governments in solving this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 583, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'worst' (without 'more') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: worst
...their car to go home, the traffic would more worst that waste them a lot of time on the ro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81720430108 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51971071241 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562724014337 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6948717179 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.384615385 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19174381558 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780613685345 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495820095043 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131960226887 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391273312206 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.