Biotechnology companies all over the world are developing different types of genetically modified (GM) crops. However, not enough is known about the effects of these crops on our health and on environment. Inferring with nature in this way should be prohibited. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Biotechnology improves our standard of living by helping with the maintenance of health diet. Some people claims that since this has unproven risks involved in our health, so it should be prohibited. However, I believe that, despite with this side effect, the potential future growth in this field is worth more. Therefore, it should not be prohibited.
Genetically modified Crops (GM) have not yet proven for all consequences. Firstly, it could affect the health of human. Since GM foods are scientifically intervened to increase nutritional quality, it can result in some allergic reactions. Also it is not end with an allergic reaction, it can have other side effects because the consequences of this type of food has not been examined. Secondly, there would be some damages on the soil. The more biotechnology is used, the more nutrients and vitamins are drained from the soil. In other words, the crops will have no fruitful, since GM food has been absorbed all the nutrients from the earth. Lastly, there is a potential unexpected pollination across the crop field. When the GM foods are being planted, there is a high probability that the pollination will be occurring across the land. The consequences of phenomenon of these mixed foods are unknown.
Despite with all these fearful future consequences, the GM produces future opportunities to grow. The use of biotechnology makes the foods to be available throughout the year by efficient land usage, despite the climate unsustainable due to the global warming. Therefore, people can enjoy from constant healthy diet all year round by foods being available during unconventional growing seasons. Since GM foods have maximised all the benefits (enhance the nutritional values), people could obtain more valuable and rich substances of nutrients from food so that they can manage their eating habit. Improved the quality of GM food will lead a less eating habit due to the sustain satiation. Thus, it can put a halt in the world hunger issue.
In conclusion, it is understandable for people to fear for the consequences of man-made food since the results of such a product are unknown. However, prevent of such a product can limit future growth for biotechnological experiments. Therefore it is not recommended to be prohibited.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 238, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... can result in some allergic reactions. Also it is not end with an allergic reaction...
^^^^
Line 3, column 664, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...od will lead a less eating habit due to the sustain satiation. Thus, it can put a halt in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 235, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...rowth for biotechnological experiments. Therefore it is not recommended to be prohibited....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 255, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended being'.
Suggestion: recommended being
...ogical experiments. Therefore it is not recommended to be prohibited.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'lastly', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'in conclusion', 'in other words']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.240963855422 0.247107183377 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.156626506024 0.155533422707 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0939759036145 0.0946595960268 99% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0457831325301 0.0501214627716 91% => OK
Pronouns: 0.033734939759 0.0437548338989 77% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134939759036 0.122226691241 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0530120481928 0.0403226058552 131% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.9618925573 2.80594681477 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0168674698795 0.0326793684256 52% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.115662650602 0.0861772015684 134% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.033734939759 0.021408717616 158% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00240963855422 0.011925033212 20% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2280.0 1933.35771543 118% => OK
No of words: 371.0 316.048096192 117% => OK
Chars per words: 6.14555256065 6.12580529183 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20517956788 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.363881401617 0.374742101984 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.269541778976 0.28420135186 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.204851752022 0.203846283523 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.137466307278 0.137316102897 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9618925573 2.80594681477 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.037074148 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504043126685 0.56093040696 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 53.9941245186 60.7387585426 89% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0891783567 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.1304347826 20.7743622355 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0765335879 49.517814964 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1304347826 127.492653851 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1304347826 20.7743622355 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.565217391304 0.814263465372 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.99599198397 100% => OK
Readability: 43.0846126802 49.1944974215 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.81632653061 1.69124875643 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39229182918 0.332605444948 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120346499727 0.102741220458 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0848886684625 0.0668466124924 127% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.460658221009 0.534860350844 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.137032955965 0.148594505496 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136789584539 0.134430193775 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521723400113 0.0742795772207 70% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.363631186065 0.324371583561 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.113243141425 0.0638462369009 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259999538765 0.228012699653 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707334355071 0.058150111329 122% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.68436873747 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.41683366733 176% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.5751503006 194% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.