Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
DO YOU THINK THIS IS A POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE DEVELOPMENT?
It is undeniable that the vast earth has become smaller and smaller thanks to the new innovations and technologies. Many people now has the opportunity to order, buy or sell a variety of products from all over the world through the internet. Although this may sound like a good news for the manufacturers, I do not consider the change to be a good one for the countries.
Firstly, cultures and traditions are among of the elements that represent a certain nation. Due to the exposure to different cultures from buying different materials from outside the borders, young generation today are adopting new and exciting forms to express themselves. Amidst this, the cultures and traditions of the nation is being replaced and as a result, it is loosing its own individuality. Teens and children do not have any idea of rich past of their own motherland which can be regarded as shame for all the proud citizens.
Secondly, replica and pirated commodities posses a great on the international marketing. Just because same type of products are available all around the globe, it does not mean they are the genuine ones. If the replicas are not of good quality, the customers become dissatisfied with the original companies and their sales plummet and it certainly leaves a negative impact on the economy.
To conclude, analogy is good as long as we can maintain individuality. The same can be repeated for a country or a business.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'good news'.
Suggestion: good news
... internet. Although this may sound like a good news for the manufacturers, I do not conside...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1194.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93388429752 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88217734479 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599173553719 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6463809682 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138309818183 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438660281122 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391558837389 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0772742237118 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329676330566 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.