In the developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and internet access. Disscuss both views and give your opinion.
In poor coutries, many children in the remote areas lack of educational provision. While some people suggest to install more computers and internet access to deal with the problem, I would argue that the top priority should be providing more schools and teachers.
On the one hand, there are many reasons to believe that providing more computers and Internet access means a lot to students in rural communities. Firstly, students can learn without being afraid of distance. Since there are huge sources of information, students can easily get access and find out neccessary documents which help them in their studying. Secondly, pupils can train their IT skills while using computers. In this computing era, having such skills is a big advantages for their career.
On the other hand, I agree with those who contend it is better to provide more schools and teachers. One of the principal reasons is teachers play a vital role in the early stage teaching basic skills such as literacy and numeracy, which computers do less effectively. The other reason is schools and teachers will create educational environments, which are like smaller societies. Thus, students can learn not only from their teachers but also from their friends.
In conclusion, I would argue that the provision of more schools and teachers is a vital first step in exceeding education for children in remote areas
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest installing'.
Suggestion: suggest installing
...ducational provision. While some people suggest to install more computers and internet access to d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 227.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10572687225 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60343105299 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577092511013 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 506.74238477 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.862262856 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5833333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307723886032 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102794249387 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858838765375 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1754683322 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087260784701 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.