Differences between coutnries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share the same fashions, advertising, brands, eating habits and TV channels. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of this?
Recently, the board between the countries is gradually curtailed, thereby allowing exchanging products, culture, fashion styles and so on. While becoming a global village has some drawbacks, I would argue that it has some benefits.
On the one hand, the downsides are inevitable when the phenomenon of globalization appears. For one, this trend will significantly weaken the traditions. For example, the increase in the number of Korean films strongly leading to Vietnamese fashion, and sometimes youngsters excessively splash out to follow their idol styles which might not be suitable with their financial status. As a result, the beauty of national culture is currently at stake.
On the other hand, regardless of these aforementioned disadvantages, its perks cannot be denied. One benefit is that people will no longer doubt the other nations by means of sharing the same habits, products and services. Therefore, all the countries will take advantage of tightening the bond and reinforcing the relationship. Another advantage is that this can help to enhance modernity and give them the opportunity to keep abreast to well-known brands and advertisement. For example, Nike or Coca Cola subsequently reinforce the ubiquity in most of the nations in the globe and so those nations were actually considered as a part of the international community and their citizens are able to access to international goods.
In conclusion, while I partly with the disastrous repercussion of cultural globalization, I absolutely believe that its benefits will be outweighed by its detrimental results and it can be seen by the progress within a society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42023346304 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14385329371 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642023346304 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7421973901 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.083333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0714109456531 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0257145266198 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027226584144 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.036811891355 0.151304729494 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024767852263 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.