Do you think that customer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of producers to avoid extra packaging of products? Give me your view or any relevant example of your own experience.
Packaging has become as important as the original products. Nowadays, market is flooded with over packed items. Some people believe that customer should reject such items whereas other believes that producers should stop extra packaging of their products. I shall explain the both cases and my view points.
Customer is considered as a king in consumer market and whole market is driven by the consumer’s choice. Therefore, customers should reject or dislike the products which they do not like or not match their expectation. For example, automobile giant re-packaged their model with new look and design. It was not appreciated by the consumers and they had to switch to original base model. Also, the cost incur for extra packaging of items is also borne by the consumers. For marketing, companies focus on packaging and degrade the quality. Thus, product becomes attractive from outside, however, add less value for customers. Such kinds of trends were seen in the past where customer stopped using the company’s product, resulting, phase out of their products from market.
Nevertheless, producer has ethical responsibility towards their products and customers. It is considered that producer should provide the best products at reasonable prices. Most of the producers claim that their products are best in the market and they always think first about the customer. Some the brand talks about the trust and long term relationship. For instance, giant super market Tesco openly challenge that their food items are best and cheap in the industry and there are no fringe cost on extra packaging.
In conclusion, customer has full choice to reject the over packed items. Customer should constantly provide the feedback about the product. On the other hand, producers bear the moral responsibility to supply items which fulfill customers need and choice.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36271186441 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69442698913 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566101694915 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7777831197 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.75 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243149161335 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758403833506 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516692467402 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159653124355 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198296868943 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.