Employers nowadays put more emphasis on social skills Some people believe that social skills are important in addition to good qualifications for job success To what extent do you agree or disagree

In the contemporary era, many companies are considering social skills while employing people. Many people perceive that social skills are equally crucial as technical knowledge. As per my own accord, this is completely agreeable and this essay provides reasons to justify my agreement.

To begin with, any work environment requires employees to work alongside various people. Most of the time, they have to work in groups and hence social skills are necessary to have good progress in any task. Social prowess helps in maintaining good relations with colleagues, which not only increases personal efficiency but also elevates the team's performance. For example, consider a group project, it is very crucial for all the members of the group to maintain a good rapport, otherwise, communication problems may arise among them. In other words, employees who can socialize well can contribute to better working conditions.

Moreover, one should have good communication skills to stand out in a bunch of persons. As many offices conduct discussions and meetings frequently, employees need to share their ideas or object to those of others. In these situations, people who can address a crowd well are most likely to succeed. For illustration, although an employee has a great idea, he/she need to present it perfectly in front of others to bring it into implication. As a whole, social abilities play a vital role in succeeding among many people.

In conclusion, social skills have become quite prominent these days. Either in creating an appropriate working environment or in making an impact while working with people, social prowess is extremely necessary.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teams'' or 'team's'?
Suggestion: teams'; team's
...rsonal efficiency but also elevates the teams performance For example consider a grou...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... contribute to better working conditions Moreover one should have good communicat...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ribute to better working conditions Moreover one should have good communication skil...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 451, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'ability'?
Suggestion: ability
...g it into implication As a whole social abilities play a vital role in succeeding among m...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21755725191 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75824301885 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599236641221 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 262.0 20.2975951904 1291% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1367.0 106.682146367 1281% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 262.0 20.7667163134 1262% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 111.0 7.06120827912 1572% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215559125847 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.215559125847 0.084324248473 256% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138533703033 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300590474828 0.056905535591 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 134.2 13.0946893788 1025% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -194.45 50.2224549098 -387% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 105.5 11.3001002004 934% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.48 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 21.21 8.58950901804 247% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 9.78957915832 592% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 106.8 10.1190380762 1055% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 58.0 10.7795591182 538% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.