The environment problem facing today's world are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation. Government and large companies should responsible for the deducing the amount of damage being done to the environment. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is an alarming issue that environmental degradation has become more severe. While the government and enterprises should take their responsibilites for reducing the damage, I believe that individuals also aid to ameliorate the situation.
On the one hand, the government and companies should place a high priority on alleviating the problems. From the government’s perspective, they might implement environmentally-friendly rules and regulations to cut down the contamination. For example, by imposing green taxes on commuters and fostering public transports usages, the volume of traffic declines, meaning that exhaust fumes which play a vital role in global warming significantly diminish. Similarly, large companies should counteract environmental destruction due to their adverse impacts on air, water and land qualities. Instead of consuming fossil fuel resulting in polluted emission, chemical pesticides leading to destroy the ecological balance, they should invest in alternative energy sources and organic products. Not only do these actions ease the damage but they also help to achieve a sustainable development.
On the other hand, just few individuals also can reduce the negative effects on the environment. They can join one of the organizations which form part of the green movement, in order to campaign for people awareness. Residents should abide by the rules of pollution reduction such as no smoking at public places. Additionally, customers are encouraged to replace plastic material on reusable one in packaging. This will slash the vast amount of waste which does not break down easily after years.
In conclusion, it is true that the government and large companies should take draconian measures; however, I opine that law-abiding citizens also have a huge influence on environmental protection.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... influence on environmental protection.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, similarly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71428571429 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36481929417 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663003663004 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9425065006 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.428571429 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200394980988 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609077433029 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379701410419 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115763839796 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199484278516 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.