Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Due to the constant development it has been widely noticed that plethora of minor languages are disappearing even though there are some negative consequences of this, I reckon that fever language will be boon to the citizen as well as the countries.
First of all having a global language as lingual franca Will remove the barriers and the hotel people face when they are exchanging their ideas which will eventually result in vibrant relationship. As a result, it will not only benefit their international business and trade, but also have a thriving relationship between in the political bureaucrats as there will be more opportunities to share the goods and commodities Between the countries. To illustrate Japanese delegates are often encouraged to use english while cracking a deal.
Secondly it will also be a blessing for students who plan to acquire an international degree and broaden their horizon. This is because they will able to live in other countries and easily adopt to the surrounding. Also, the transition from their home country to a new land will be smoother. Canada and Australia are two good examples where people from manifold places come there to study.
On the other hand, the possible minor demerits cannot be neglected. When tye native language lost it’s important, it’s culture and tradition is lost overtime and all the place would become the same. The Aboriginal spices of Australia are on the verge of extinction due to tue same reason.
In recapitulation, while some people seem to try and protect their region languages, i deen that alleviated language barriers would lead to psychological benefits to people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...e to live in other countries and easily adopt to the surrounding. Also, the transition f...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...capitulation, while some people seem to try and protect their region languages, i deen ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, i reckon, as a result, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14126394052 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85762156743 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613382899628 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0026881138 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193930060674 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639160845728 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476934418578 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106560664288 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397292902481 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.