Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In this pop culture and materialistic scenario, it is a moot issue that parents of the offsprings who are enrolled in the private schools do not need to make a contribution through taxes. However, I utterly contradict this notion. This essay will scrutinize my viewpoint and provide a sophisticated solution.
At the outset of this new millennium, there is a greater imbalance in the privileged and unprivileged people who ceases the growth of the community indeed it is the most indispensable reason of not reducing the taxes of individuals. In addition, only affluent dwellers send their children to private schools so it is their fundamental duty to pay the taxes so that poverty-stricken class can get an exposure to the better education.
Moving further, it also plays a crucial role in the development of society. As it is a well-known quote by Nelson Mandela that Education is the most powerful weapon we can use to change the world. Moreover, by imposing taxes on moneyed people, an education budget will burgeon and in turn, it adds up to the education peculiarities. This will boost up the literate workforce and the country will become more productive and prosperous. To epitomize, overseas companies need well-educated youngsters and merely well-funded schools can provide this.
Hammering the last nail of this topic, I would support that there should not be any kind of rebate to the families who send their adolescents to the private schools. Rather the slabs should be identical to all the natives of same income level.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ial role in the development of society. As it is a well-known quote by Nelson Mand...
^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...eir adolescents to the private schools. Rather the slabs should be identical to all th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, well, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0905511811 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03047584837 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59842519685 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6972844939 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.75 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291745290019 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845431918218 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071106459343 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162657003156 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056395768641 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.