Thanks to the development of modern technologies, online newspapers have become more and more familiar with a bulk of people regardless of their ages or occupations. Because of that, there is a frequent public debate on whether these gadgets can completely replace the traditional printed newspapers or books. In this essay, I would indicate my approval of this opinion by giving several merits of online newspapers and ebooks.
Three main factors support the idea of the online newspapers’ benefits. In the first place, convenience could be the key rationale underlying the rising shift of people's reading habit into reading online. More specifically, modern gadgets enable citizens to catch up with the latest news everywhere without purchasing it from a specific place. Moreover, a wide range of topics to be chosen is compounded with the previous reason. People are able to decide whatever they like instead of wasting time searching from irrelevant issues to their preferences. Last but not least, the practices of reading online books and newspapers are not only beneficial to individuals but also have positive impacts on the society as a whole. With the reduction of travel distance to the bookstore, people are likely to save a noticeable amount of money on gasoline or other expenditures of transportation. On the grander scale, it could reduce fuel emission which was mostly contributed by vehicles and cut off the demand of materials used for books and newspapers each year.
I admit that online newspapers and e-books could possibly lead to unemployment among a group of employees working in that sector. However, it is a requirement in this digital century and creates new sources of jobs on website designs or journalism….
In conclusion, I would argue that reading everything online is of significant benefit from both individuals and community scale. Accordingly, it would be generally advisable that people should put their efforts into adapting this trend.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Three main factors support the idea of the online newspapers’ benefits. In the ...
^^
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...dmit that online newspapers and e-books could possibly lead to unemployment among a group of e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, in conclusion, in fact, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32063492063 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94228689189 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7797688175 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.733333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217206817274 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064045382153 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0224781600336 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115861493899 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339538699911 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.