Global environmental issues are the responsibility of rich nations not of poorer nations. Do you agree with this opinion.
In recent decades enviromental issues have been attracting a great deal of media attention worldwide due to its substantial impacts on the development of the humankind. Although the proposal of developed nations’ accountability to the international community for these problems sound reasonable, I think that it is the liability of every country.
There are a multitude of reasons why developed nations should be responsible for some enviromental problems. First, affluent nations have more scientists and enviromental connoisseurs with worldwide reputation than any other developing countries. This means their co-operation would be conductive to the finding of a more efficient energy to replace fossil fuel, which is the main factor of carbon emissions. In addition, Developed countries’ strong financial muscles could be invariably associated with many capital investment activities in projects developing advanced green technologies. For example,In some European states, the application of solar and nuclear power for electricity production has remarkably reduce the dependency on coal consumption, which acts as a deterrent for the accumulation of small particles in the atmosphere.
However, Some developing countries are highly-recommended to liable for some environmental issues for several reasons. First, As third world countries means a faster development of highly-industrialized parks with many manufacturing factories than any wealthy nations, which could lead to increase in the emission of exhausted fumes. This means that the local official authorities should undertake some initiatives to curb carbon and methane emissions, which could substantially rehabilitate the environment. Second, A low degree of public awareness of environment preservation can culminate in some green issues especially deforestation and overexploitation in developing countries. This means that the local authorities should establish more education institutions to alert the citizens about the negative repercussions of environment problems, which would remarkably raise their appreciation and desire for protection.
In conclusion, Global environmental issues are the mutual responsibility both developed and developing countries. The official authorities as well as the citizens worldwide should make efforts to alleviate these problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , In
...advanced green technologies. For example,In some European states, the application o...
^^^
Line 3, column 719, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'reduced'.
Suggestion: reduced
...r electricity production has remarkably reduce the dependency on coal consumption, whi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 910, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... raise their appreciation and desire for protection. In conclusion, Global env...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, third, well, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2031.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.24923076923 5.12529762239 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.56443444314 2.80592935109 127% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581538461538 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7111477676 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.071428571 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131335190459 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516868272491 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443450100996 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0870882176735 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295125930912 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.27 12.4159519038 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.