Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Traffic improvement is one of the most controversial topic in development countries, including my country, Vietnam. Government has spent billions of dollar to build and fix the road every year, yet the traffic situation is still an issue. There is an argument that Government should spend money on railroads rather than roads. I don't totally agree with this idea and I will explain my opinion clearly below.
First of all, railway or road, which one should be prioritized depends on the geographic and condition of the country or the area, as well as the demand of the society. For example, in mountainous area and for the purpose of mass transportation, railway should be considered to build first, as it will solve the problem of long distance and heavy transport. Follow up the new built railway, there will be more road for civil transportation. It will be different if there is need of daily transportation with short distance in plain area.
Secondly, solving the traffic issue is not about spending a lot of money in some situation solution, it is about spending money carefully in a holistic plan. In my opinion, building more short distance railway and advocate people to use it as daily transportation can also be implemented along with upgrading and building new road to solve traffic jam are just a part of the strategy to eliminate present issue we are facing everyday. There can be more factors and aspects to be concerned in this strategy, such as environment pollution, civil housing, means of transportation vehicles. Focusing in only one aspect can't make the sustainable effect.
To conclude, I suggest that building and upgrading railways and roads should be referred as a part of a more holistic strategy rather than consider them as the only solution of traffic issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...money on railroads rather than roads. I dont totally agree with this idea and I will...
^^^^
Line 5, column 426, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...o eliminate present issue we are facing everyday. There can be more factors and aspects ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 616, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...n vehicles. Focusing in only one aspect cant make the sustainable effect. To con...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, such as, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87837917354 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546666666667 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8068606317 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.384615385 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188787775272 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765359023739 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910900645743 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124288568351 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553800654116 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.