Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Transportation and Communication are two indispensable aspects of the development of a country and both are interdependent. At the outset of this new millennium, quick and safe transportation is essential to commute and for the establishment of the trade in a country. However, there are a few people who say that Government should spend money on railways while others condemn this viewpoint and assert that roads are of prime importance. This essay will scrutinize both virtues and will give a sophisticated solution.
Advocates of the first viewpoint say that rail commuting is comparatively safe. The number of road accidents and casualties are almost negligible in many countries. In addition, rail networks offer cheap traveling. Also, it is environment-friendly and causes a pollution to a minimum extent. Moreover, the capacities of railway enhance its benefits and lend a helping hand to outweigh it than other modes of transportation.
On the flip side, the road network is accessible to each place which is impossible for the railway tracks. Furthermore, private transportation can only flourish on the roads and it will make populace independent. On the contrary, railway tracks assists in solving the shortcomings of Traffic congestion as well as Air Pollution. Last but not least, rail tracks can carry a plethora of passengers along with goods at a one time which is not achievable from roads.
Mulling over the topic, from my notion, Albeit roads and highways serves a plenty of functions which are crucial to us but advantages of rail tracks outweigh the advantages of roads as the former is more reliable transportation system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'pollution'.
Suggestion: pollution
..., it is environment-friendly and causes a pollution to a minimum extent. Moreover, the capa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28897338403 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30940924708 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600760456274 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0308284423 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3571428571 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127230603089 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365845177315 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499741655053 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0649286526001 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491350039379 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.