Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is a common knowledge that rail lines and roads play a key role in commuting and communication, So many believe that governments should invest many budgets to construct the railway but some people think building roads need to pay attention more.
On the one hand, constructing roads have 2 main benefits. Firstly, from my point of view, drivers can transit passengers, goods by different means of transportation such as car, bus, lorry due to variation of vehicles. Secondly, commuting on roads provides possibilities to stop wherever want to rest or shop. However, unlike rail line, governments may be enforced to devote many funds to construct roads because of preventing traffic jam. What is more, roads cause many accident and much pollution due to burning fossil fuels and immense congestion there.
On the other hand, as far as my experience concerned, rail line are usually located far away from main cities. Also, it requires to destructing any locks for instances mountain, building, jungle and river. As a consequence, it probably needs to allocate a large number of budgets. Furthermore, trains are low speed and time-taking modes of transportation. On the contrary, the truth is that safety and reducing traffic congestion is one of the issues in which government should pay attention to more. Also, in my view, rails can carry hundred of people ans several tones of goods.
In conclusion, whereas expense financial on roads infrastructure can be useful, I am of the opinion that railway progression is a decisive factor in inhibition of current transport system problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 467, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun accident seems to be countable; consider using: 'many accidents'.
Suggestion: many accidents
... traffic jam. What is more, roads cause many accident and much pollution due to burning fossi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...sequence, it probably needs to allocate a large number of budgets. Furthermore, trains are low sp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 536, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...more. Also, in my view, rails can carry hundred of people ans several tones of goods. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
...onclusion, whereas expense financial on roads infrastructure can be useful, I am of t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my view, on the contrary, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18992248062 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96732450579 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.643410852713 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7205426879 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.3846153846 7.06120827912 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0678965759845 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0211078967572 0.084324248473 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0215925240945 0.0667982634062 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0414432421559 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178880354676 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.