Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?.

Essay topics:

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?.

There is an ongoing controversy argument that whether governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. Some people think that road is more suitable than railways. However, in my opinion, I believe that spending money on railways can make more benefit than using it for roads for several reasons.

First, train is the cheaper way to travel than car or bus. People should get the valuable public transport with the minimum cost and the government should provide the sufficient support for people. For instance, in my country, the train cost only 5 pounds to travel from Bangkok to Chiangmai, compared to the bus, which cost 12 pounds. Clearly, the train is the low-price transportation, so the governments should invest on railways more to ensure that people in their countries get the reasonable public transportations.

Second, the railways’ system emit less pollution than the other transport in roads’ system. Nowadays, most cars still need oil to make to possible move. Consequently, the carbon that was produced from the car engines will damage the environment and harm the living creatures. In contrast, the trains can use other clean energy, such as electricity, to propel the train instead of oil. This innovation reduces the significant level of environment problems that humans are now terrified. So the government ought to persuade people to use this clean technology by spending more money on the railways, rather than the roads.

In conclusion, investing on railways contributes more benefits on roads. It brings the cheaper way of transportation and causes less pollution to the environment. I strongly believe that the world will be better if the governments invest more on the railways.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'in my opinion']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.288888888889 0.247107183377 117% => OK
Verbs: 0.120634920635 0.155533422707 78% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0825396825397 0.0946595960268 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0412698412698 0.0501214627716 82% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0222222222222 0.0437548338989 51% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130158730159 0.122226691241 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0222222222222 0.0403226058552 55% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.89190361012 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0349206349206 0.0326793684256 107% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.101587301587 0.0861772015684 118% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0285714285714 0.021408717616 133% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00634920634921 0.011925033212 53% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1732.0 1933.35771543 90% => OK
No of words: 276.0 316.048096192 87% => OK
Chars per words: 6.27536231884 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20517956788 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.405797101449 0.374742101984 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.289855072464 0.28420135186 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.217391304348 0.203846283523 107% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.141304347826 0.137316102897 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89190361012 2.80594681477 103% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.037074148 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557971014493 0.56093040696 99% => OK
Word variations: 56.9056917452 60.7387585426 94% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0891783567 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.25 20.7743622355 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7425917795 49.517814964 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.25 127.492653851 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7743622355 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8125 0.814263465372 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 46.2355072464 49.1944974215 94% => OK
Elegance: 2.39655172414 1.69124875643 142% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19895662173 0.332605444948 60% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0934767513865 0.102741220458 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0611456707765 0.0668466124924 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.568107610046 0.534860350844 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13042079951 0.148594505496 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970956774583 0.134430193775 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079720739293 0.0742795772207 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.383901053172 0.324371583561 118% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.174825490423 0.0638462369009 274% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15594413232 0.228012699653 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604011799982 0.058150111329 104% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.41683366733 176% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 1.9629258517 204% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.4468937876 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.