Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement
As the international transport becomes more regular kind of activity, it can seem that government doesn't take into account the actual needs of the world population. Nowadays, there are serious dilemmas about the complex topic of infrastructure, especially regarding the construction of roads and railways in one country. The real question is whether the government should contribute more to the railway construction or, totally opposite, to the roads development. In my personal opinion, it should be the investment in roads.
First of all, let us consider the advantages of roads in international transport. The main advantage of roads in international transport is availability for anyone who prefer this kind of connection. Roads are adaptable for cars, trucks, buses and it is a long-established belief that highways connect countries in the closer manner. If the government invest in roads, people will be able to sit in their vehicles and reach a destination in own pace. Secondly, the most public organs still seek the opportunity to remind of the roads importance in the worlds communication. Take the road Belgrade - Nis - Pristina as the future example. For most of Europeans, this Balkan route will be the best way to reach the coast and, for the rest, it would be the ideal economic route.
Turning to the railways, it must be seen that this kind of transport enjoys popularity between various groups of people. On the one hand, we can see that those who prefer tourist travelling usually take advantage of railways. At the same time, economy related transport, export and import branches are not railway concentrated. It should be the reason why governments will need to invest more money in roads rather than in railways construction.
To try and conclude then, roads are famous for the bunch of benefits and it would be clearly backwarding if the government disregard this potential. As an economic sector and international commerce become the matter of government choice, there would be no more rewarding solutions than to bring more roads to life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...f activity, it can seem that government doesnt take into account the actual needs of t...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 446, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
...nstruction or, totally opposite, to the roads development. In my personal opinion, it...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 471, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...posite, to the roads development. In my personal opinion, it should be the investment in roads. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
...l seek the opportunity to remind of the roads importance in the worlds communication....
^^^^^
Line 3, column 553, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...o remind of the roads importance in the worlds communication. Take the road Belgrade -...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rather than in railways construction. To try and conclude then, roads are famo...
^^^
Line 7, column 4, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...r than in railways construction. To try and conclude then, roads are famous for the...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'regarding', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'kind of', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.272727272727 0.247107183377 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.120320855615 0.155533422707 77% => OK
Adjectives: 0.096256684492 0.0946595960268 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0347593582888 0.0501214627716 69% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0294117647059 0.0437548338989 67% => OK
Prepositions: 0.125668449198 0.122226691241 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0133689839572 0.0403226058552 33% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.99120978548 2.80594681477 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0267379679144 0.0326793684256 82% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.109625668449 0.0861772015684 127% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0320855614973 0.021408717616 150% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0106951871658 0.011925033212 90% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2071.0 1933.35771543 107% => OK
No of words: 337.0 316.048096192 107% => OK
Chars per words: 6.14540059347 6.12580529183 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20517956788 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.370919881306 0.374742101984 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.275964391691 0.28420135186 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.210682492582 0.203846283523 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.154302670623 0.137316102897 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99120978548 2.80594681477 107% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.037074148 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560830860534 0.56093040696 100% => OK
Word variations: 61.4344995336 60.7387585426 101% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0891783567 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.8235294118 20.7743622355 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6128859947 49.517814964 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.823529412 127.492653851 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 20.7743622355 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.647058823529 0.814263465372 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 3.99599198397 175% => OK
Readability: 47.4199685809 49.1944974215 96% => OK
Elegance: 2.23188405797 1.69124875643 132% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0648387928083 0.332605444948 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.107582885124 0.102741220458 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0568820218296 0.0668466124924 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.564118315103 0.534860350844 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.113228647102 0.148594505496 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338208771052 0.134430193775 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476380794027 0.0742795772207 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.448041868213 0.324371583561 138% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.13589664922 0.0638462369009 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0637416275406 0.228012699653 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475041450668 0.058150111329 82% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.41683366733 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 1.9629258517 204% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.