Since the industrial revolution a few centuries ago, all kinds of pollution and other environmental problems has been becoming more crucial to overcome. Recently, and increasing number of transportation modes have been causing other global issues such as traffic problems. It is generally believed that soaring the price of petrol up would help to solve all these catastrophic issues, moreover, it is the best possible way. However, I completely disagree with this opinion since rising price of the most widespread fuel may result in adverse effects, furthermore, there exist another completely different, but more favorable measures.
First of all, raising the cost of gasoline and has a row of harmful consequences. The primary one is the following increase of price for a vast majority of products, especially imported ones, which depends on location of the region. As the expenditures on fuel increases, the cost of transported goods rises consequently. On an average, expenses on transportation are estimated to 30% of the eventual value. In addition, it may trigger inflational processes, therefore, the quality of live mars. The cost of fuel grows, people are forced to spend the money on it, but more in that time, since petrol-based transport is necessary for them. As a result, the quantity of discontenteds and people using public transport intensifies, which means that they are occurs need in more buses and taxis. Altogether, I am convinced that the growing price of petrol cannot be a great solution of environmental and traffic problems at all.
Regarding the possible way to overcome them, it is significant to take action step by step. For instance, in order to lighten tension on the city streets, building new overpasses may improve traffic, moreover, creating efficient road-system could lower the number of vehicles in one particular area. Simultaneously, several environmentally-friendly alternative source of energy ought to enter the market to decrease the amount of exhaust fumes soaring in the atmosphere. Some filters may be installed in sewerage to prevent flow of heavy metals in the soil and water reservoirs, released from tailpipes. Furthermore, using electric cars not only eases noise pollution, but also reduces greenhouse gases in the air.
To summarize, instead of increasing petrol cost, other more successful measurements should be done, for example, replacement of fuel or making sufficient routes, thence it is possible to solve all issues.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2105.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41131105398 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16276663114 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622107969152 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2169807989 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.944444444 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6111111111 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133140028202 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0360620003258 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440550615295 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824014243381 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354498893973 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.