Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measure do you think might be effective?
The argument of increased fuel price as the key to tackle the issue of pollution and traffic congestion is both supported and refuted by many. It is disagreed that it is the only way and there is another practical approach to this problem.
To begin with, an increased in petrol cost will have an insignificant effect on reducing the usage of private cars, which is the main cause of air pollution and congested roads. This is because the people who can still afford to pay the high cost of fuel, will still drive their cars for convenience. For instance, the UK government increased the petroleum cost five times last year, but the result was immaterial declined in car usage of just 5%. This shows that it has little effect in solving this issue.
Furthermore, the most practical solution is to use public transport. The government should sponsor an awareness campaign that will enlighten people’s initiative to avail of a mass transport system. People’s attitude towards this new change plays a crucial role in the success of this approach. For example, if the use of renovated mass transit is widely accepted by commuters in a progressive business district, it can have a retroactive effect in passengers of nearby cities. Thus, the promotion of public transport usage will be an effective tool to lessen the cars on the roads.
In conclusion, although increasing the fuel cost can help to solve the problem of air pollution and congestion on roads, I believe that the key to combat the problems are reduction of private car’s usage and availment of public transport.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The argument of increased fuel price as ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... practical approach to this problem. To begin with, an increased in petrol co...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...little effect in solving this issue. Furthermore, the most practical solution...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ool to lessen the cars on the roads. In conclusion, although increasing the f...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'furthermore', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'thus', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.288659793814 0.247107183377 117% => OK
Verbs: 0.137457044674 0.155533422707 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0893470790378 0.0946595960268 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0240549828179 0.0501214627716 48% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.020618556701 0.0437548338989 47% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127147766323 0.122226691241 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0240549828179 0.0403226058552 60% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.72749192862 2.80594681477 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0309278350515 0.0326793684256 95% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.13058419244 0.0861772015684 152% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0274914089347 0.021408717616 128% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0103092783505 0.011925033212 86% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1605.0 1933.35771543 83% => OK
No of words: 267.0 316.048096192 84% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01123595506 6.12580529183 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20517956788 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.355805243446 0.374742101984 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.2734082397 0.28420135186 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.209737827715 0.203846283523 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.161048689139 0.137316102897 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72749192862 2.80594681477 97% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.037074148 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561797752809 0.56093040696 100% => OK
Word variations: 56.887034568 60.7387585426 94% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0891783567 75% => OK
Sentence length: 22.25 20.7743622355 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8862595199 49.517814964 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.75 127.492653851 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7743622355 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.814263465372 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.99599198397 100% => OK
Readability: 49.59082397 49.1944974215 101% => OK
Elegance: 2.41509433962 1.69124875643 143% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304550218329 0.332605444948 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.1049332548 0.102741220458 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0764102828754 0.0668466124924 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.597192529139 0.534860350844 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.175657774651 0.148594505496 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143820527509 0.134430193775 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792302733302 0.0742795772207 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.430316292486 0.324371583561 133% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0453211886819 0.0638462369009 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238387694115 0.228012699653 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438146541592 0.058150111329 75% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.68436873747 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.41683366733 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.5751503006 155% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 10.0 10.4468937876 96% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.