Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
In this 21st century, traffic congestion and pollution have become the major issues around the world. Some people assume that soaring the price of petrol is the proper way to tackle this problem, but from my perspective, it might trigger other problems in our society. However, there is another measure which should be considered to cope this issues.
There is a common concern that increasing petrol price would reflect to social economic sectors. Petrol is the basic element of product prices which plays pivotal role for transporting and distributing goods. If the price of petrol raises, it will cause a severe contraction in the basic human needs such as food and cloth cost. Hence, it would affect directly to people’s welfare and exacerbate economic stability in a country. Nevertheless, we could not ignore that there are some countries which were successful to control jamming traffic and pollution by increasing petrol price. Norway; for example, it is one of the most prosperous countries which have the highest average petrol price in the world.
Besides, there is other argument that imposing tight regulations for having vehicles is likely to be a wise idea. People are easier to get new car today due to the financial credits, while there is a trend competition in automotive industry for making the low-cost cars. Research carried out by statistics center in New York shows that the large number of using cars in many developing countries increased by almost 60 percent since the financial liberalization era. This research makes clear that the strict rules are needed to control growing of vehicles and reduce other related issue such as pollution.
All thinking considered, enacting stringent regulations is an ideal solution to cope traffic density and pollution problems than increasing petrol price which have negative effects to people life.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
but from my perspective, it might trigger other problems in our society. However, ...
Description: don't put 'However' 'but' so close.
Sentence: However, there is another measure which should be considered to cope this issues.
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to this and issues
there is other argument
there is another argument
Sentence: All thinking considered, enacting stringent regulations is an ideal solution to cope traffic density and pollution problems than increasing petrol price which have negative effects to people life.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to people and life
This research makes clear that the strict rules are needed to control growing of vehicles and reduce other related issue such as pollution.
This research makes it clear that the strict rules are needed to control the growing vehicles and to reduce other related issues such as pollution.
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
Double check grammar after essay writing.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 300 350
No. of Characters: 1535 1500
No. of Different Words: 183 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.162 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.117 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.555 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 120 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 84 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 51 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.429 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.602 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.643 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.337 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.55 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.063 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'while', 'for example', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.271903323263 0.247107183377 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.166163141994 0.155533422707 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.123867069486 0.0946595960268 131% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0181268882175 0.0501214627716 36% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0211480362538 0.0437548338989 48% => OK
Prepositions: 0.108761329305 0.122226691241 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0574018126888 0.0403226058552 142% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.64263526677 2.80594681477 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0332326283988 0.0326793684256 102% => OK
Particles: 0.00302114803625 0.00163938923432 184% => OK
Determiners: 0.0876132930514 0.0861772015684 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0181268882175 0.021408717616 85% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0151057401813 0.011925033212 127% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1876.0 1933.35771543 97% => OK
No of words: 301.0 316.048096192 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.23255813953 6.12580529183 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20517956788 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.41196013289 0.374742101984 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.285714285714 0.28420135186 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.196013289037 0.203846283523 96% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.112956810631 0.137316102897 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64263526677 2.80594681477 94% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.037074148 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601328903654 0.56093040696 107% => OK
Word variations: 66.852007647 60.7387585426 110% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0891783567 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.5 20.7743622355 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1744921493 49.517814964 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 127.492653851 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7743622355 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 0.814263465372 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 50.0714285714 49.1944974215 102% => OK
Elegance: 2.13235294118 1.69124875643 126% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360415874151 0.332605444948 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0944002995043 0.102741220458 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0355641982388 0.0668466124924 53% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.534408647401 0.534860350844 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.156857418479 0.148594505496 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149326000449 0.134430193775 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519119504474 0.0742795772207 70% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.272507602039 0.324371583561 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.109804783666 0.0638462369009 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245390791973 0.228012699653 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426902313319 0.058150111329 73% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.41683366733 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.90881763527 118% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.5751503006 116% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.4468937876 115% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.