Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?

Essay topics:

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?

With the population explosion, numerous problems are coming in the way of development.These shortcomings range from environmental issues to health, physical impacts and so on. However, some individuals assert that inflation is the best way to solve the traffic jams as well as environmental problems. I utterly disagree with this notion. This essay will scrutinize the same virtue and will suggest a solution to this sophisticated issue.

At inspective, tackling a problem like traffic congestion and environmental pollutions must be done at wide scale. Although, these problems are faced by an entire world, still, it cannot be solved by hiking the prices of fossil fuels. The awareness campaigns can motivate the individuals to join the hands to overcome such issues. Moreover, public transport system should be preferred as compared to the private which in turn lend a helping hand to solve this difficulty.

In addition, public must be made aware of the consequences of these obstacles on their health. Moving further, there should be certain rules and regulations for this concerned trouble, To epitomize, Delhi-The Capital of India implemented an odd-even concept in an entire town. According to this legislation, the three particular days were credited to an odd number vehicles whereas remaining three to even registration numbers. This rule proved to be successful to a greater extent. On the contrary, undoubtedly, the rise in prices can cause less traffic and smog complications. But it is not long-term criteria to overcome the problem.

Mulling over the topic, handling such messes along with the public will prove a blessing in disguise. Besides this, citizens must have the knowledge of Non-Renewable resources.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: These
...ms are coming in the way of development.These shortcomings range from environmental i...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, whereas, in addition, as well as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42962962963 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05622663787 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651851851852 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9335385359 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.625 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122021768657 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412432369017 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506100635629 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704339232933 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486591872437 0.056905535591 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.