it is more important for governments to spend public funds on promoting a healthy lifestyle than treatment. Do you agree or disagree?
The world health care system has been facing an enormous pressure due to frequent outbreaks of diseases. Some people believe that governments should allocate more money to educate people about healthy lifestyle rather than treatment. I strongly accord with this statement.
To begin with, there goes a saying “an ounce of prevent is worth a pound of cure”. This means the precaution is conclusively more important than treatment. Economically speaking, medical fee for a single individual can amount up to millions of dollars which is out of reach of many people, especially the poor. It would be wiser that Government, instead of devoting a substantial amount of money to covering medical fee, might launch public campaigns to teach people how to steer clear from diseases. Compared to the former approach, promoting healthy lifestyle proves to be cost-effective and more widespread. In addition, through national and local awareness enhancement campaigns, people can be equipped with well-rounded information of potential health risks associated with bad habits. In the long run, people are imbued with the idea that prevention being superior to treatment.
Equally important, the outbreak of diseases has become unpredictable. There are ample extraordinary epidemics that professional doctors have not yet found the measures to avert their detrimental effects or at least slow down them. For example, Zika virus has taken millions of innocent people’s lives just for several months and if this case continuously spread out, the mankind might be threatened. Therefore, strengthen people’s immune system is the most vital principle that people have to bear in mind.
In conclusion, heightening the level of public awareness is of paramount importance that governments have to prioritize, however, they also cannot neglect its concert on the supply of medical treatment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...vention being superior to treatment. Equally important, the outbreak of diseases has...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 518, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ciple that people have to bear in mind. In conclusion, heightening the level of ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, at least, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55862068966 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93402687005 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668965517241 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4971812029 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.466666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178911181072 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591748188771 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794499973922 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110167832128 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463554554721 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.