It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car, a television and a fridge. Do the disadvantages of this development for society outweigh the advantages?
It is an ever-increasing debate whether the drawbacks of possessing a car, a television and a fridge outweigh its benefits regarding the social development. While some individuals are in favour of this opinion, I am personally of the opposite side due to some following arguments.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that these everyday-used goods namely cars, TV sets and fridges are detrimental for our community. Firstly, they will leave a serious impact on human health. Being in front of the television or behind the wheel for a long time results in sedentary habits which consequently triggers some digestive disorders. Using fridge to store foods prompts unhealthy eating habits, particularly when people have a tendency to snack on some fattening treats available. Secondly, these goods will have an adverse impact on the environment since necessitating cars and fridges can generate the greenhouse emissions. Besides, the dispose of these products, when they reach the end of their lifetime, may be harmful to the natural habitats.
On the other hand, I would contend that using these consumer products is exceedingly beneficial. Car travelling is an innovation of modern society as it reduces commuting time, which consequently frees people of utilizing their time to devote to their works or their family. A television enables people to access to the information of global changes up to the minute. Bonus, undoubtedly a delectable and healthy meal cannot be done unless there is a modern fridge owning to its convenience of storing food for long periods. Additionally, today with the fast-paced growth of technology, the environment issues relating to the dispose of high-tech products will be tackled effectively.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the benefits of these goods are much more pivotal than its drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 645, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rate the greenhouse emissions. Besides, the dispose of these products, when they reach the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 622, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ogy, the environment issues relating to the dispose of high-tech products will be tackled e...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30821917808 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03191877064 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606164383562 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3704007118 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110062567598 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033603057005 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316364528486 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0596664359621 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377601574978 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.