Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem?
Criminal rates and the solution to reduce this problem has been controversial for the last few decades, yet criminals tend to become worse after being imprisoned and penalized. This essay will discuss about the reasons behind this and the methodology of the catastrophe.
It is clear that people do not like to be changed and forced not to do specific actions. In a psychological facet, many want to freely have a choice, yet by punishing them is no different from making them follow one’s opinions. This is not an exception for criminals. For instance, educate prisoners so that they will have responsibility for society provokes anger and displeasure. As a result, they will wait for the time to no longer be imprisoned to execute unfavourable actions because they want to demonstrate that they cannot be tamed nor a property of the government. A statistical survey announced that 81% of criminals will perform crimes again after serving the first punishment.
A solution for this is a gradual impact of art to help them stay calm and feel respected. As similar to any other individuals, lawbreakers have altruism and can be generated with proper methods. Art, such as painting or listening to music will alter the heart of these individuals. This method has an exquisite way to influence them slowly, make them believe that prison or punishments are somewhat enjoyable. Consequently, offenders would feel like they not despised by society, but rather cherished and they have no motivation to repetitively commit crimes. An important suggestion to add that everyone wants empathy, not sympathy. With a sophisticated impact on criminals, they would certainly change and perfect themselves.
In conclusion, the main reason for lawbreakers to execute wrong behaviours is the disrespect and forceful actions. With regards to this, authorities are required to provide them with sufficient care and compassion to stimulate a better version of every individuals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun want seems to be countable; consider using: 'many wants'.
Suggestion: many wants
...ific actions. In a psychological facet, many want to freely have a choice, yet by punishi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a better version of every individuals.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31847133758 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02516257159 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605095541401 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4413497524 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2352941176 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182403197956 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554448793191 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528917212084 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110028620418 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051487174715 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.