Many peole assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods.
To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal?
Along with the increasing population in any parts of the world, many are convinced that production of materials and goods should be prioritized. I strongly disagree with this notion and I will explain further the drawbacks in my essay below.
It is true that producing extra perishable and non-perishable goods can merit citizens. Primarily because it will generate jobs to the people. With the high supplies needed, manpower will be much of demand. Also, there will be an upward trend in the economical status of the nation. This means that more taxes will be collected and would greatly be used for improving health and education. Apart from that, having more supplies during calamities can help compensate the needs of man.
However, there are factors that outweighs the advantages. Firstly, an increase probability of food spoilage and wastage of materials will be anticipated, especially, if there are more supply over demands. Secondly, prices and taxes are expected to escalate because of the fast production and transportation. Finally, nature will be in a dangerous state. Case in point, numerous of trees will be put down in order to produce paper bags and boxes for the packaging. Furthermore, usage of plastics are likely to be rampant as well. Improper disposable of garbage and deforestation will consequently lead to pollution and natural disasters such as flood, landslide and the like.
To sum it all up, although multiplying the number of supplies can be beneficial at some points, there are far more important factors that need to be considered by the people and the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...o, there will be an upward trend in the economical status of the nation. This means that m...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, apart from, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18076923077 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87982936296 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.791203095 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1875 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161078718354 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510384786796 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470567982586 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102150017517 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295601607635 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.