Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school.
What are the reasons? What could be done?
In this day and age, the topic of lacking focus on lessons is one which bears some consideration. This is indubitably the consequences of electronic devices and hard work at school, yet resolvable through government and educational institutions' actions.
The inability to concentrate on lectures results from two underlying reasons. The most notable factor is the burdens difficult lessons place on students. These pressures lead to sleep deprivation and mental breakdowns, which prevents children from paying attention when teachers deliver lectures. Modern technology in classrooms should also be considered. Since these devices are highly addictive, they will distract users from their study and make them fall behind their peers due to the lack of concentration. According to Tuoi Tre, Vietnam's leading news source, since students were allowed to use smartphones in classes in 2009, the number of students studying effectively has declined strikingly.
In order to rectify the situation, there needs to be suitable approaches from the government and schools. Firstly, The amount of knowledge contained in each lesson should be reduce to ensure students can accumulate effectively. Secondly, the government ought to introduce a ban on gadgets that are harmful to learners. Last but not least, every educational institutions need to impose discipline and punishment on students when they use technological devices for entertaining purposes.
Thus, it can be seen that the inability to pay attention to lectures is the outcome of academic pressures and electronic equipment used at school. Therefore, it should have been abundantly demonstrated that solutions from both government and educational institutions are urgently needed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reduced'?
Suggestion: reduced
...edge contained in each lesson should be reduce to ensure students can accumulate effec...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72200772201 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08236781368 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648648648649 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8299767758 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.857142857 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145802747141 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045967618673 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448672358993 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847790129921 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298823611529 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.