The media should limit how much bad news they report because it discourage people from doing activities which usually involve very little sick Do you agree or disagree

Undoubtedly, the media play a great role in the present time so that every body access to information as much as they want. However, most news reports tend to exaggerate events occurred in across the world. This might cause little risk people doing.

As far as my experience concerned, many follow the authentic news, even though someone tends to declare unofficial news. Hence, people might be influenced by one and fear doing some activities, foe instance, crime rates may be a major factor in discouraging people who want visiting a city. Another example is when terrorism attack a place where local residents stop doing activity and go out for a while. As a consequence, in my point of view, government should restrict some news which is really unpleasant.

On the other hand, there are strong reasons for arguing that the media should not limit their reporting. Firstly, it could be due to free access to information so as to decide by their own analysis. In the second place, people have to be informed in order to aware events happening nearby. Moreover, they have to be able to decide for themselves what risks are involved in particular activity. For example, when there has been an accident on the road, in my opinion, I do not stop driving, I prefer to drive carefully and keep going on.

In conclusion, It is important to realize that the media have a duty to report all significant events. As a result, people find their work pleasant. Also, this attract their confidence to reporters and this increases their freedom to act in a way which is best for them.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (5 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...occurred in across the world. This might cause little risk people doing. As fa...
^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ld be due to free access to information so as to decide by their own analysis. In the se...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, really, second, so, then, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in particular, as a result, in my opinion, in the second place, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78754578755 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60743602891 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641025641026 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2853533356 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1333333333 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.7333333333 7.06120827912 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216663128303 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627732058945 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268579131353 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119522255949 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032912524477 0.056905535591 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.