Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge.
To what extent is this a positive or a negative development?
Copyright is the legal right to control the production and selling of a book, play, film or piece of music. However, a substantial proportion of people can download copyrighted books and music from the Internet for free. In my opinion, in spite of this is certainly a positive trend, but it has a few negative aspects.
By downloading copyrighted books and music free of charge, a large number of individuals have the chance not only to acquire encyclopedic knowledge but also to feel absolutely delighted. This is due to the virtual treasure trove of information on the Internet, so a considerable number of books and a large amount of music can be found online and downloaded easily. Therefore, all strata of society have an equal chance to become literate. For example, several families barely live at subsistence level, and they cannot afford to buy a book. Thus, an access to the Internet is enough in order to have a free acquaintance with science, mathematics or history.
On the negative side, notwithstanding the benefits, the drawbacks cannot be overlooked, which pose a credible threat to authors. One of the main disadvantages is the copyright infringement. To enumerate, when individuals download music or books without paying, they are breaking the law. As a result, they are subject themselves to legal liabilities. Moreover, incurred heavy losses are deemed as an adverse impact of downloading copyrighted music and books for no charge. Both publishing houses and music industry entirely relying on sales of records and books respectively. Accordingly, books writers and music composers will be discouraged to proceed in their works.
In conclusion, while this activity has undoubted benefits, of which disseminate knowledge is the most apparent, it has also some downsides also, most notably is the breach of copyright. Hence, I think this activity seems a quite positive development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...righted books and music free of charge, a large number of individuals have the chance not only to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...they cannot afford to buy a book. Thus, an access to the Internet is enough in order to h...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, however, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25163398693 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06467828322 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584967320261 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7841154657 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5294117647 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41176470588 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344132661227 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990005121959 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824193733339 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201235937061 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839383420235 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.