It is argued by some people that the budget spent on space exploration should be allocated to address urgent issues like poverty, education, or worldwide crises regardless of the enormous benefits that space research has brought to human beings. However, I disagree with this judgment.
People do not conduct space research merely for contenting curiosity, those studies are extremely precious from scientific and economic perspectives. Space exploration has broadened our horizons about the universe, the origin of our Earth, and the solar system. This valuable knowledge directly benefits in creating technology breakthroughs. Utilizations derived from accomplishments outside the Earth are not ambiguous to the general population, by contrast, these are much more familiar to us. Take meteorology, for example, weather forecast was no longer an arduous task like before with the worthwhile support from the weather satellite system. More obvious evidence of the vital role of space research is the Global positioning system (GPS) which is fundamentally based on artificial satellite systems. Pilots will be likely to confront a ton of challenges to navigate a plane, as well as taxi drivers, tend to be troublesome to reach the destinations, without GPS.
However, pouring money into space does not mean the concern about other crucial problems is sinking into oblivion. Only a small number of countries have space research programs. In other words, governments of the majority of nations still concentrate the vast money and resources to cope with poorness, environmental pollution, and illiteracy. Even in predominant countries in space affairs, the money that they invest in space missions only takes up a few percentages of their national budget. Besides, inventions involving space studies also help to solve global realistic puzzles to some extent. To be specific, satellite internet has provided a working platform for outsourced jobs in developing countries, contributing to a significantly decreased unemployment rate in these countries.
In conclusion, space research is undeniably beneficial, thus should be financially encouraged to develop beside other priorities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 848, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'navigating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: navigating
... likely to confront a ton of challenges to navigate a plane as well as taxi drivers tend to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... problems is sinking into oblivion Only a small number of countries have space research programs ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5736196319 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95804307253 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628834355828 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 326.0 20.2975951904 1606% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1817.0 106.682146367 1703% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 326.0 20.7667163134 1570% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 117.0 7.06120827912 1657% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226965204071 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.226965204071 0.084324248473 269% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141636991855 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475701496786 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 167.8 13.0946893788 1281% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -276.33 50.2224549098 -550% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 132.8 11.3001002004 1175% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 16.51 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 25.76 8.58950901804 300% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 62.0 9.78957915832 633% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 132.4 10.1190380762 1308% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 133.0 10.7795591182 1234% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.