The last decade many people from cities opt for living countryside because of its proximity to the silence and calm atmosphere where they can enjoy the beauty of the nature. Undoubtedly, that such kind of people need to more more, travelling a huge distance daily to get their workplaces, which makes traffic jams and air pollutions worse. However, there are several solutions that can be used to stimulate people not to spoil the environment.
Firstly, people, who live countryside, prefer to have a high paid work, which is constantly possible in cities only. Having a high salary allows them to cover all expenses including travel costs. Obviously, they could work somewhere closer to their houses if there were more job offers. So, it would be a great government contribution, to the development of local business projects, sustaining eco-friendly manufacturing. For example, to give dairy-farmers a boost to enhance their growth by reduction taxes.
On the other hand, people, moved to a suburbs, can miss entertainment and, as a result, continue to reach after the joyfulness or unforgettable impressions, which they find in the cities. For example, big clothing stores as fashion providers are still situated mostly in the city centers. Cinemas, famous cultural places can be included to the list of entertaining places. Probably, the best way to unload the pressure to the traffic, especially on weekends, is a support of reading books more on such as craftwork, where people produce items manually.
In conclusion, there is no reason to accept the environment damaging by anthropogenic factors as traffic congestion and emissions to the air. It is true that government are able to promote policy, which can improve the ecology. Even though people get used to work in the city, there are many examples of successful eco-friendly manufacturing or family occupations worldwide. If governments pay more attention to such measures, then there is no reason why people will have to overpass in convenient travelling from villages to cities as routine.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: more
...tedly, that such kind of people need to more more, travelling a huge distance daily to ge...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'more' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: more
...tedly, that such kind of people need to more more, travelling a huge distance daily to ge...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 37, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a suburb' or simply 'suburbs'?
Suggestion: a suburb; suburbs
... On the other hand, people, moved to a suburbs, can miss entertainment and, as a resul...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, then, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25151515152 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97653665047 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621212121212 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7578116918 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.3125 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241108101902 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664158867275 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530235010346 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139864733533 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392621495219 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.