Increasingly, higher number of city workers move to countryland, even if they have to travel longer time into work. As a result, this issue causes other significant problems such as growing traffic congestion and detrimental effect on the local environment. By traveling long distances into workplace, increasing number of transportation modes leads to considerable rise in amounts of greenhouse gases releasing to the atmosphere. Therefore, it is extremely crucial to make the concept of living in cities more appealing to mundane workers.
In order to identify what measures could be taken to reduce this problem, understanding of its roots and reasons is essential. Generally, the main reason to choose ruval areas are concerns of city population in healthier ecological situation. For instance, villages or suburbian regions have less concentration of chemical polutants in the air and the index of noise pollution ir rather lower in comparison with the centres of large cities.Thus , if the government creates favourable conditions for living, workers will possibly be more enthusiastic and therefore, prefer urban areas. Take for example several European countries (e.g. Norwey) where environmental issues in the cities were eliminated by switching on alternative energy sources such as wind power or gydroelectroplants. Consequently, people are less anxions about harmful impact of damaged environment.
Furthermore. the necessity of novelties in entertaining field is gradually becoming vital. Since intact nature of rural areas appear city workers who have nerve-wrecking and frenzied work life, opportunities to have a rest and find piece of mind ought to be increased. For exampe, construction of recreational areas as parks with ponds or botanic gardens could be a brilliant idea to encourage working population to stay in the cities.
On the whole, the underlying problem of ruvalization causing ecological issues and tense traffic jam is overwhelanting important to solve. Although it may not completely aid to overcome this, erection of entertaining natural places and reducing the concern of people on urban environment will be beneficial in any case.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...arison with the centres of large cities.Thus , if the government creates favourable ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...on with the centres of large cities.Thus , if the government creates favourable co...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...rmful impact of damaged environment. Furthermore. the necessity of novelties in entertai...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...of damaged environment. Furthermore. the necessity of novelties in entertaining ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, e.g., furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in any case, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63414634146 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24970212893 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664634146341 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1616003209 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29293568778 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079799515183 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440474388562 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145645661267 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846615865373 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.04 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.