Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this changed improved the way people live?
Food is one of the fundamental need of mankind and from the bygone days, individuals have invented a plenty of ways to prepare and customize food. However, it is rightly remarked that eating is a necessity while cooking is an art. In this ultra-modern tech scenario, cooking has become everyone's cup of tea due to the several advancements in technology. This essay will scrutinize the alteration of styles of cooking and their impacts.
At the outset of this new millennium, with a shift in technological advancements, preparing food is not a herculean task anymore. However, the rice cookers, pressure cookers, meal cookers and easy availability of ingredients makes it even more uncomplicated. In addition, there are a plethora of restaurants and cafeterias emerging in our surroundings which provide a ready-made food 24X7. This can be illustrated with an example of Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant which prevails in an entire world and offers assistance every day without any break.
Considering the improvements, I utterly believe that this drastic trend customizes the lives of individuals. Also, it succors them to divert their precious time towards any other significant work. Not just this, it breaks the monotonous of the daily routine of cooking and gives the exposure to the housewives of various electronic appliances. Apart from this, the inclusion of microwave oven makes everything quite straightforward. This is a leap towards the contemporary life that one can make food within a fraction of minutes.
Hammering the last nail of this topic, the improve way of cooking has molded the lives of a populace that they have enough quality time to spend with their family members rather than staying for a long in the hot kitchen.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... Hammering the last nail of this topic, the improve way of cooking has molded the lives of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21631205674 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02617764171 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627659574468 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8405970613 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.071428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203586720658 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613155651568 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434089173457 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117063993657 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02528424154 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.