Nowadays more and more young people hold the important positions in the government. Some people think that is a good thing while others argue that it is not suitable. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about whether young people should hold highly posts in the government. While some people disagree with this trend, I believe that young authorities could play an important role in the development of the country.
On the one hand, there are several notable drawbacks if young people hold key positions in a government. Firstly, they do not have enough considerable experiences in their working management which need to be accumulated gradually for a certain working time. Therefore, young leaders tend to face many challenges in terms of addressing team conflicts and controversial issues. Secondly, it is not easy for the young to convince older coworkers of their leadership capabilities. It is due to that fact that young leaders are always thought to have insufficient abilities to manage such aspects of policy as the economy and international affairs.
On the other hand, in my opinion, young people can be considered an important part of the government because they can bring benefits to the development of the society. It is obvious that the youth are a huge advantage allowing the young to be creative and innovative. Therefore, young leaders can implement effective reforms which can improve economic growth and attract investment capital in their own countries. In addition, the young have a very long period of time to contribute to their nations. For example, with the same abilities and qualification, a younger candidate is more likely to be elected than an older counterpart in some countries because of his longer anticipated time of devotion to public service in the future.
In conclusion, although there are bitten arguments for both views, it seems to me that young people should hold key roles in the government because of their innovation and creative thinking that make a significant contribution to the national wealth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...In addition, the young have a very long period of time to contribute to their nations. For exa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt contribution to the national wealth.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23588039867 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93326321152 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56146179402 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4775066938 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.230769231 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3076923077 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248586240595 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861101047689 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761596050193 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157744325454 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676072537098 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.