These days, electronic transactions such as transferring a money with an application are so widespread among people specially contemporary cities and also be a succinct replacement of paper money. From my point of view, it has some pros and cons. However, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
First and foremost, one of the good attribute of this replacement is about transferring speed. Indeed, the transactions will be done quickly than the paper ones. It stand to reason that lack of time and disability to manage it is so communal between vast majority of people. This perception leads subjects to save a considerable amount of time. The other benefits of this idea is rescuing the environment by reducing the consumption of paper cash. Going under the surface, producing this material prone society to be in a destructive way. Furthermore, paper cash could threat citizen’s health due to absorb bacteria to itself and be harmful if someone touch it and spread illnesses throughout society.
On the other hand, one of the principal issue of this idea is lack of contribution as well as devoid of knowledge in some parts of country gives rise this perception be misused and misunderstanding. Some illegal routes will be appeared and hackers will deteriorate circumstances. To be more elucidated, thieves have an access to the bank accounts and high amount of money would be stolen later on. Consequently, it puts a strain on people to stay in credit and they expose getting robbed.
Overall, despite the fact that this approach will be an impressive way to save a plant from dropping an usage of paper cash, some sophisticated as well as will-educated persons should be hired in order to regulate and evaluate this replacement to put it in a right way and elude from getting failed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'money'.
Suggestion: money
...ronic transactions such as transferring a money with an application are so widespread a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'stands'?
Suggestion: stands
...be done quickly than the paper ones. It stand to reason that lack of time and disabil...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a destructive way" with adverb for "destructive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ucing this material prone society to be in a destructive way. Furthermore, paper cash could threat c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...es. To be more elucidated, thieves have an access to the bank accounts and high amount of...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ssive way to save a plant from dropping an usage of paper cash, some sophisticated...
^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a right way" with adverb for "right"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...and evaluate this replacement to put it in a right way and elude from getting failed.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05369127517 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03997213247 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593959731544 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.1280239804 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.4 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118464281923 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399361282984 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294167163994 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759255458089 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201785467701 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.